CHOOSING TO USE FORWARD CONTRACTS AS HIS HEDGING TOOL INSTEAD OF OPTIONS

In reference to the Lfthansa Case Herr Ruhnau was accused of making the following four errors:

1). Purchasing the Boeing aricraft at the wrong time. The U.S. dollar was at an all time high at the time of the purchase in January 1985.

2). Choosing to hedge half the exposure when he expected the dollar to fall. If he had gone through with his instincts or expectations, he would have left the whole amount unhedged (which some crtics have termed “whole hog”).

3). Choosing to use forward contracts as his hedging tool instead of options. The purchase of put options would have allowed Herr Ruhnau to protect himself against adverse exchange rate movements while preserving the flexibility of exchaning DM for U.S. dollars spot if the market moved moved in his favor.

4). Purchasing Boeing aircraft at all. Germany, as well as the other major European Economic Community countries, has a vested interest in the manufacture of large long-distance civil aircraft.

Given these criticisms, should the board of Lufthansa retain Herr Heinz Ruhnau as chairperson? How should Ruhnau justify his actions and so justify his further employment?

1. Herr Ruhnau was accused of making the following mistakes (alongwith a few other errors):

Purchasing the Boeing aircraft at the wrong time. The U.S. dollar was at an all-time high at the time of the purchase in January 1985.

Purchasing Boeing aircraft at all. Germany, as well as the other major European Economic Community countries, had a vested interest in the joint venture Airbus. Airbus’s chief rival was Boeing in the manufacture of large long-distance civil aircraft.

Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"