true experimental design research essay

/in /by

True Experimental Design

Identify how prison officials could use a true experimental design if they wanted to test the impact of a new rehabilitation program designed to be administered to inmates in the four weeks leading up to their release. Be sure to identify the elements of a true experiment and specifically how the impact of the program would be tested.

Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Requirements:

Review the Module 4 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.

Rubric

CRJ330 Mod 4 CT
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
25.0 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 20.0 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 15.0 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

 10.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

 16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

 8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation
15.0 to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in either assessing surveys or experimental design.

 12.0 to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 9.0 to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

 6.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least three credible sources, as specified in description.

 4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates two credible sources, as specified in description.

 3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates one credible source, as specified in description.

 2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates no credible sources.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

 8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

 6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

 4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
5.0 to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

 4.0 to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

 3.0 to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

 2.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0
 
Looking for a similar assignment? Our writers will offer you original work free from plagiarism. We follow the assignment instructions to the letter and always deliver on time. Be assured of a quality paper that will raise your grade. Order now and Get a 15% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"